About

Log in?

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Anyone can log in and get personalized features such as favorites, tags and feeds.

Log in as DTU user Log in as non-DTU user No thanks

DTU Findit

Journal article

A simplified dynamic inflow model and its effect on the performance of free mean wind speed estimation

In Wind Energy 2013, Volume 16, Issue 8, pp. 1213-1224
From

Department of Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark1

Aeroelastic Design, Department of Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark2

Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark3

Dynamical Systems, Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark4

Model‐based state space controllers require knowledge of states, both measurable and unmeasurable, and state estimation algorithms are typically employed to obtain estimates of the unmeasurable states. For the control of wind turbines, a good estimate of the free mean wind speed is important for the closed‐loop dynamics of the system, and an appropriate level of modelling detail is required to obtain good estimates of the free mean wind speed.

In this work, three aerodynamic models based on blade element momentum theory are presented and compared with the aero‐servo‐elastic code HAWC2. The first model, known as quasi‐steady aerodynamics, assumes instant equilibrium of the wind turbine wake, a modelling approach often used by model‐based control algorithms.

The second model includes the dynamic wake also known as dynamic inflow and gives a more correct description of the actual physics of the wind turbine wake. The dynamic inflow model includes a number of dynamic states proportional to the number of radial points in the spatially discretised blade formulation.

The large number of dynamic states inhibits the use of this model in model‐based control and estimation algorithms. The lack of dynamic inflow in the first model and large number of dynamic states in the second model lead to a third model, a simplified dynamic inflow model, which with only a single dynamic state is still able to capture the most significant dynamics of the more advanced dynamic inflow model.

Simulations in the aero‐servo‐elastic code HAWC2 compare the ability to estimate the free mean wind speed when either the first or third model is included in the estimation algorithm. Both a simplified example with a deterministic step in wind speed and full degrees‐of‐freedom simulations with turbulent wind fields clearly show that the inclusion of the dynamic inflow model in the free wind speed estimation algorithm is important for good free mean wind speed estimates.

Language: English
Year: 2013
Pages: 1213-1224
ISSN: 10991824 and 10954244
Types: Journal article
DOI: 10.1002/we.1548
ORCIDs: Hansen, Morten Hartvig and Poulsen, Niels Kjølstad

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Log in as DTU user

Access

Analysis