Book
Low cost vs. high-end eye tracking for usability testing
IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
60018567
Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
60008724
Accuracy of an open source remote eye tracking system and a state-of-the-art commercial eye tracker was measured 4 times during a usability test. Results from 9 participants showed both devices to be fairly stable over time, but the commercial tracker was more accurate with a mean error of 31 pixels against 59 pixels using the low cost system.
This suggests that low cost eye tracking can become a viable alternative, when usability studies need not to distinguish between, for instance, particular words or menu items that participants are looking at, but only between larger areas-of-interest they pay attention to.
Language: | English |
---|---|
Year: | 2011 |
Pages: | 1177-1182 |
Types: | Book |
DOI: | 10.1145/1979742.1979744 |