About

Log in?

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Anyone can log in and get personalized features such as favorites, tags and feeds.

Log in as DTU user Log in as non-DTU user No thanks

DTU Findit

Journal article

Towards grouping concepts based on new approach methodologies in chemical hazard assessment: the read-across approach of the EU-ToxRisk project

From

Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine1

University of Konstanz2

Stockholm University3

L'Oréal Research & Innovation4

Pompeu Fabra University5

Procter and Gamble6

Unilever7

University of Vienna8

Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research9

BASF10

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark11

Research Group for Chemical Risk Assessment and GMO, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark12

Certare UK Ltd13

Leiden University14

Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors15

Federal Institute for Risk Assessment16

European Chemicals Agency17

...and 7 more

Read-across is one of the most frequently used alternative tools for hazard assessment, in particular for complex endpoints such as repeated dose or developmental and reproductive toxicity. Read-across extrapolates the outcome of a specific toxicological in vivo endpoint from tested (source) compounds to "similar" (target) compound(s).

If appropriately applied, a read-across approach can be used instead of de novo animal testing. The read-across approach starts with structural/physicochemical similarity between target and source compounds, assuming that similar structural characteristics lead to similar human hazards. In addition, similarity also has to be shown for the toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic properties of the grouped compounds.

To date, many read-across cases fail to demonstrate toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic similarities. New concepts, in vitro and in silico tools are needed to better characterise these properties, collectively called new approach methodologies (NAMs). This white paper outlines a general read-across assessment concept using NAMs to support hazard characterization of the grouped compounds by generating data on their dynamic and kinetic properties.

Based on the overarching read-across hypothesis, the read-across workflow suggests targeted or untargeted NAM testing also outlining how mechanistic knowledge such as adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) can be utilized. Toxicokinetic models (biokinetic and PBPK), enriched by in vitro parameters such as plasma protein binding and hepatocellular clearance, are proposed to show (dis)similarity of target and source compound toxicokinetics.

Furthermore, in vitro to in vivo extrapolation is proposed to predict a human equivalent dose, as potential point of departure for risk assessment. Finally, the generated NAM data are anchored to the existing in vivo data of source compounds to predict the hazard of the target compound in a qualitative and/or quantitative manner.

To build this EU-ToxRisk read-across concept, case studies have been conducted and discussed with the regulatory community. These case studies are briefly outlined.

Language: English
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Year: 2019
Pages: 3643-3667
ISSN: 14320738 and 03405761
Types: Journal article
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-019-02591-7
ORCIDs: Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Log in as DTU user

Access

Analysis