About

Log in?

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Anyone can log in and get personalized features such as favorites, tags and feeds.

Log in as DTU user Log in as non-DTU user No thanks

DTU Findit

Journal article

Comfort and performance impact of personal control over thermal environment in summer: Results from a laboratory study

From

Eindhoven University of Technology1

Maastricht University2

Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark3

Section for Indoor Environment, Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark4

Field studies suggest that the availability of adjustable thermostats, operable windows and other controls has a positive impact on comfort, the incidence of building related symptoms and productivity. This laboratory study was designed to further investigate how having or not having control over the thermal environment affects human responses to the indoor environment.The study was conducted in summer in a field laboratory that was kept at 28°C.

A total of 23 subjects were exposed twice for about 2.5h. During the first session (A) subjects were able to fine-tune their local thermal environment at any given time with a personal desk fan with continuous, stepless adjustable control. During the second session (B) subjects still had the desk fans, but this time the fans were controlled from an adjacent room by the researchers who adjusted the individual air speed profiles so they were identical to those recorded during the first session.

Thus, each subject was exposed to two customized conditions with identical exposure, only different from a psychological point of view.During the two sessions identical questionnaires and performance tests were used to evaluate subjects' comfort, SBS symptom incidence and performance. As expected, perceived control over the environment was significantly higher during session A, but there were no differences in perceived comfort and SBS symptom intensity.

Both self-assessed and objectively measured performance was significantly better during session B. About two-thirds of the subjects indicated to prefer the situation as during the first session when they themselves controlled the air movement.

Language: English
Year: 2015
Pages: 315-326
ISSN: 1873684x and 03601323
Types: Journal article
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.12.022
ORCIDs: Toftum, Jørn and Olesen, Bjarne W.

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Log in as DTU user

Access

Analysis