About

Log in?

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Anyone can log in and get personalized features such as favorites, tags and feeds.

Log in as DTU user Log in as non-DTU user No thanks

DTU Findit

Journal article

Review of life-cycle based methods for absolute environmental sustainability assessment and their applications

From

Polytechnique Montreal1

University College London2

Massey University3

University of York4

Chalmers University of Technology5

RISE Research Institutes of Sweden6

European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute7

Swedish Environmental Research Institute8

Unilever9

Quantis Lyon10

Concordia University11

Doka Life Cycle Assessments12

Zhejiang University13

Universite Jean Moulin Lyon 314

Sustainability, Department of Technology, Management and Economics, Technical University of Denmark15

Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Sustainability, Society and Economics, Department of Technology, Management and Economics, Technical University of Denmark16

Department of Technology, Management and Economics, Technical University of Denmark17

Navigant18

...and 8 more

In many regions and at the planetary scale, human pressures on the environment exceed levels that natural systems can sustain. These pressures are caused by networks of human activities, which often extend across countries and continents due to global trade. This has led to an increasing requirement for methods that enable absolute environmental sustainability assessment (AESA) of anthropogenic systems and which have a basis in life cycle assessment (LCA).

Such methods enable the comparison of environmental impacts of products, companies, nations, etc, with an assigned share of environmental carrying capacity for various impact categories. This study is the first systematic review of LCA-based AESA methods and their applications. After developing a framework for LCA-based AESA methods, we identified 45 relevant studies through an initial survey, database searches and citation analysis.

We characterized these studies according to their intended application, impact categories, basis of carrying capacity estimates, spatial differentiation of environmental model and principles for assigning carrying capacity. We then characterized all method applications and synthesized their results.

Based on this assessment, we present recommendations to practitioners on the selection and use of existing LCA-based AESA methods, as well as ways to perform assessments and communicate results to decision-makers. Furthermore, we identify future research priorities intended to extend coverage of all components of the proposed method framework, improve modeling and increase the applicability of methods.

Language: English
Publisher: IOP Publishing
Year: 2020
Pages: 083001
ISSN: 17489326 and 17489318
Types: Journal article
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab89d7
ORCIDs: Hauschild, Michael Zwicky , Owsianiak, Mikolaj , Ryberg, Morten and 0000-0001-8419-3708

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Log in as DTU user

Access

Analysis