About

Log in?

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Anyone can log in and get personalized features such as favorites, tags and feeds.

Log in as DTU user Log in as non-DTU user No thanks

DTU Findit

Journal article

A Review of Electrolyte Equations of State with Emphasis on Those Based on Cubic and Cubic-Plus-Association (CPA) Models

From

Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark1

KT Consortium, Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark2

CERE – Center for Energy Ressources Engineering, Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark3

Technical University of Denmark4

Electrolyte thermodynamics is a complex and broad subject of immense importance in very diverse applications. The models proposed for electrolyte solutions have some similarities to those for non-electrolytes but also significant differences. Not just due to additional contributions but also because of the way the models are developed for electrolytes vs. non-electrolytes.

Moreover, there are still fundamental issues unresolved in electrolyte thermodynamics. It is still today the activity coefficient models, often extensions of local-composition models that are used in engineering practice for electrolytes e.g., the Pitzer, electrolyte NRTL and extended UNIQUAC. In this review, however, we investigate the area of equations of state (EoS) for electrolytes, a very rich field which essentially started with the Fürst and Renon model in 1993.

Since then numerous electrolyte EoS (e-EoS) have been proposed; the literature is both rich and confusing. We have decided in this work to review mostly electrolyte versions of cubic and CPA (Cubic-Plus-Association) EoS, although some of the observations made may be applicable to e-EoS of the SAFT type as well, and some of them are also briefly discussed.

Reviewing e-EoS is not an easy task due to especially the diversity of modeling and parameter estimation approaches which are followed as well as the way the models have been validated. Almost none of the e-EoS proposed in literature can be compared “on equal terms” with another e-EoS. Thus, a critical comparative analysis is proposed here, including some recent developments of the e-CPA approach.

When possible, different modeling—parameter estimation—validation approaches are compared. It is hoped that this review can provide an insight on the current state-of-the-art of some e-EoS proposed in literature and point out areas where further research is needed.

Language: English
Publisher: Springer US
Year: 2022
Journal subtitle: Journal of Thermophysical Properties and Thermophysics and Its Applications
ISSN: 15729567 and 0195928x
Types: Journal article
DOI: 10.1007/s10765-022-02976-4
ORCIDs: Kontogeorgis, Georgios M. , Schlaikjer, Anders , Olsen, Martin Due , Thomsen, Kaj , von Solms, Nicolas and Liang, Xiaodong

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Log in as DTU user

Access

Analysis