About

Log in?

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Anyone can log in and get personalized features such as favorites, tags and feeds.

Log in as DTU user Log in as non-DTU user No thanks

DTU Findit

Conference paper

Appointing in-house employee facilitators in organizational level interventions in SMEs – experiences of bricoleurs

In Proceedings of the Work Stress and Health Conference 2019 — 2019
From

Department of Technology, Management and Economics, Technical University of Denmark1

Innovation, Department of Technology, Management and Economics, Technical University of Denmark2

Implementation and Performance Management, Innovation, Department of Technology, Management and Economics, Technical University of Denmark3

Aalborg University4

Facilitation of interventions play a key role in successful interventions and typically are conducted by people with professional facilitator competences. Therefore, facilitation is a priority for any workplace implementing organizational level changes. In practice, however, developing effective and sustainable interventions and integrating facilitators as part of the process has been challenging and a low priority for small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs).

One reason is that they do not have professional facilitators in-house like larger corporations nor do they have the resources to employ them. While large companies often have the financial means and structures to effectively initiate and implement such interventions, SMEs on the other hand lack the proper knowledge and resources, including calling on external expertise, to manage organizational level interventions and thus need support mechanisms tailored to their specific circumstances (González, Cockburn, & Irastorza, 2010).

Studies of in-house facilitators are scarce in the field of organisational-level interventions. Existing studies focus on external consultants e.g. Kompier et al. (1998) report than out of ten intervention cases they reviewed, seven had an external consultant involved. A reported advantage of using external consultants in interventions is that the person is neutral, which can make it easier for employees to express their opinions and concerns (Saksvik, Nytrø, & Dahl-Jørgensen, 2002).

The disadvantages of using external consultants are that participants risk to lack ownership of the intervention, it can be difficult to sustain the changes after the consultant has left and external consultants can be expensive (Dahl-Jorgensen & Saksvik, 2005). Seen in this light, using in-house facilitators is an advantage with respect to involve employees and sustain changes when the intervention ends.

A disadvantage could be that the in-house facilitators do presumable not have the same neutrality as an external consultant.

Language: English
Year: 2019
Proceedings: Work, Stress and Health 2019
Types: Conference paper
ORCIDs: Ipsen, Christine and Poulsen, Signe

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Log in as DTU user

Access

Analysis