About

Log in?

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Anyone can log in and get personalized features such as favorites, tags and feeds.

Log in as DTU user Log in as non-DTU user No thanks

DTU Findit

Journal article

Noninvasive molecular imaging of the enhanced permeability and retention effect by64Cu-liposomes: In vivo correlations with68Ga-RGD, fluid pressure, diffusivity and18F-FDG

From

University of Copenhagen1

Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark2

Biotherapeutic Engineering and Drug Targeting, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark3

Colloids & Biological Interfaces, Biotherapeutic Engineering and Drug Targeting, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark4

Background: The accumulation of liposome encapsulated chemotherapy in solid cancers is dependent on the presence of the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with a liposome encapsulated radioisotope, such as liposome encapsulated Cu-64 (64Cu-liposome) may help to identify tumors with high lipo-some accumulation, and thereby stratify patients based on expected benefit from liposomal chemotherapy.

However, intravenous administration of liposomes without a cytotoxic con-tent is complicated by the accelerated blood clearance (ABC) phenomenon for succeeding therapeutic liposome dosing. Alternative markers for assessing the tumor’s EPR level are therefore warranted. Materials and Methods: To increase our understanding of EPR variations and to ulti-mately identify an alternative marker for the EPR effect, we investigated the correlation between64Cu-liposome PET/CT (EPR effect) and68Ga-RGD PET/CT (neoangiogenesis),18F-FDG PET/CT (glycolysis), diffusion-weighted MRI (diffusivity) and interstitial fluid pressure in two experimental cancer models (CT26 and COLO 205).

Results:64Cu-liposome and68Ga-RGD SUVmax displayed a significant moderate correla-tion, however, none of the other parameters evaluated displayed significant correlations. These results indicate that differences in neoangiogenesis may explain some EPR variability, however, as correlations were only moderate and not observed for SUVmean,68Ga-RGD is probably insufficient to serve as a stand-alone surrogate marker for quantifying the EPR effect and stratifying patients.

Language: English
Publisher: Dove
Year: 2020
Pages: 8571-8581
ISSN: 11782013 and 11769114
Types: Journal article
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S239172
ORCIDs: Elema, Dennis Ringkjøbing , 0000-0002-2706-5547 , Henriksen, Jonas Rosager , Andresen, Thomas Lars and 0000-0002-0285-024X

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Log in as DTU user

Access

Analysis