About

Log in?

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Anyone can log in and get personalized features such as favorites, tags and feeds.

Log in as DTU user Log in as non-DTU user No thanks

DTU Findit

Journal article

The Effect of Phantom Stimulation and Pseudomonophasic Pulse Shapes on Pitch Perception by Cochlear Implant Listeners

From

Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark1

University of Cambridge2

Hearing Systems Group, Hearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark3

It has been suggested that a specialized high-temporal-acuity brainstem pathway can be activated by stimulating more apically in the cochlea than is achieved by cochlear implants (CIs) when programmed with contemporary clinical settings. We performed multiple experiments to test the effect on pitch perception of phantom stimulation and asymmetric current pulses, both supposedly stimulating beyond the most apical electrode of a CI.

The two stimulus types were generated using a bipolar electrode pair, composed of the most apical electrode of the array and a neighboring, more basal electrode. Experiment 1 used a pitch-ranking procedure where neural excitation was shifted apically or basally using so-called phantom stimulation. No benefit of apical phantom stimulation was found on the highest rate up to which pitch ranks increased (upper limit), nor on the slopes of the pitch-ranking function above 300 pulses per second (pps).

Experiment 2 used the same procedure to study the effects of apical pseudomonophasic pulses, where the locus of excitation was manipulated by changing stimulus polarity. A benefit of apical stimulation was obtained for the slopes above 300 pps. Experiment 3 used an adaptive rate discrimination procedure and found a small but significant benefit of both types of apical stimulation.

Overall, the results show some benefit for apical stimulation on temporal pitch processing at high pulse rates but reveal that the effect is smaller and more variable across listeners than suggested by previous research. The results also provide some indication that the benefit of apical stimulation may decline over time since implantation.

Language: English
Publisher: Springer US
Year: 2020
Pages: 511-526
ISSN: 14387573 and 15253961
Types: Journal article
DOI: 10.1007/s10162-020-00768-x
ORCIDs: Lamping, Wiebke and Marozeau, Jeremy

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Log in as DTU user

Access

Analysis