About

Log in?

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Anyone can log in and get personalized features such as favorites, tags and feeds.

Log in as DTU user Log in as non-DTU user No thanks

DTU Findit

Conference paper

Simulation Study of the Energy Performance of Different Space Heating Methods in Plus-energy Housing

In Clima 2016 - Proceedings of the 12th Rehva World Congress — 2016
From

Technical University of Denmark1

Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark2

Section for Indoor Climate and Building Physics, Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark3

Due to a shortage of energy resources, the focus on indoor environment and energy use in buildings is increasing which sets higher standards for the performance of HVAC systems in buildings. The variety of available heating systems for both residential buildings and office buildings is therefore increasing together with the performance of the systems.

This paper reports the results of a simulation study carried out using the commercially available building simulation software IDA ICE. The considered house was designed as a plus-energy house and it was located in Denmark. The dynamic building simulation model has been validated and calibrated with measurement data from the house in a previous study.

The studied systems were radiant floor heating, warm-air heating through ventilation system and radiator heating. The energy performance of systems for achieving the same thermal comfort was compared. The effects of several parameters on system energy performance for each space heating solution were investigated; floor covering resistance of the floor heating system, having a heat recovery on the exhaust in the ventilation system, and different working temperature levels for the radiator heating.

For all cases the heat source was a natural gas fired condensing boiler, and for the floor heating cases also an air-to-water heat pump was used to compare two heat sources. The systems were also compared in terms of auxiliary energy use for pumps and fans. The results show that the investigated floor heating systems had the best performance in terms of energy with a total energy saving of 23% compared to warm-air heating with heat recovery.

It can furthermore be coupled to other heat sources than a boiler. The floor covering resistance of the floor heating system should be kept to a minimum to fully benefit from the low temperature heating potential since an increased floor covering requires higher average water temperatures in the floor loops and decreases the COP of the heat pump.

The water-based heating systems required significantly less auxiliary energy input compared to the air-based heating system. Furthermore, the results show that low temperature heating systems, as seen in floor heating in this study, can contribute to achieving plus-energy targets by minimizing the energy use for space heating purposes while achieving necessary thermal comfort for the occupants.

Language: English
Year: 2016
Proceedings: 12th REHVA World CongressREHVA World Congress
ISBN: 8791606365 and 9788791606366
Types: Conference paper
ORCIDs: Kazanci, Ongun Berk and Olesen, Bjarne W.

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Log in as DTU user

Access

Analysis