About

Log in?

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Anyone can log in and get personalized features such as favorites, tags and feeds.

Log in as DTU user Log in as non-DTU user No thanks

DTU Findit

Journal article

Calibration of surface roughness standards : KEY COMPARISON

From

Swiss Federal Institute of Metrology1

SP Sveriges Tekniska Forskningsinstitut AB2

Directorate of Measures and Precious Metals3

National Institute of Metrology4

Industrial Technology Research Institute5

National Metrology Centre6

National Metrology Institute of South Africa7

National institute of Metrology, Quality and Technology8

Laboratoire national de métrologie et d'essais9

Central Office of Measures10

Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica11

Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying12

Cem Spanish Metrology Center13

Centre for Metrology and Accreditation14

TÜBITAK National Metrology Institute15

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark16

Manufacturing Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark17

Instituto Portugues Da Qualidade18

...and 8 more

The key comparison EURAMET.L-K8.2013 on roughness was carried out in the framework of a EURAMET project starting in 2013 and ending in 2015. It involved the participation of 17 National Metrology Institutes from Europe, Asia, South America and Africa representing four regional metrology organisations.

Five surface texture standards of different type were circulated and on each of the standards several roughness parameters according to the standard ISO 4287 had to be determined. 32 out of 395 individual results were not consistent with the reference value. After some corrective actions the number of inconsistent results could be reduced to 20, which correspond to about 5% of the total and can statistically be expected.

In addition to the material standards, two softgauges were circulated, which allow to test the software of the instruments used in the comparison. The comparison results help to support the calibraton and measurement capabilities (CMCs) of the laboratories involved in the CIPM MRA. Main text To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report.

Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCL, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Language: English
Year: 2016
Pages: 04001
ISSN: 16817575 and 00261394
Types: Journal article
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/53/1A/04001
ORCIDs: De Chiffre, Leonardo

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Log in as DTU user

Access

Analysis