About

Log in?

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Anyone can log in and get personalized features such as favorites, tags and feeds.

Log in as DTU user Log in as non-DTU user No thanks

DTU Findit

Journal article

A systematic review of operating room ventilation

From

KTH Royal Institute of Technology1

Indoor Environment, Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark2

Tsinghua University3

University of Reading4

Chongqing University5

Norwegian University of Science and Technology6

Karolinska Institutet7

University of Tromsø – The Arctic University of Norway8

Warsaw University of Technology9

Aalborg University10

Technical University of Berlin11

Technical University of Civil Engineering of Bucharest12

University of Leeds13

North China Electric Power University14

Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark15

...and 5 more

Ventilation systems are the primary way of eliminating airborne pathogenic particles in an operating room (OR). However, such systems can be complex due to factors such as different surgical instruments, diverse room sizes, various staff counts, types of clothing used, different surgical types and duration, medications, and patient conditions.

OR ventilation should provide a thermally comfortable environment for the surgical staff team members while preventing the patient from suffering from any extreme hypothermia. Many technical, logistical, and ethical implications need to be considered in the early stage of designing a ventilation system for an OR.

Years of research and a significant number of publications have highlighted the controversy and disagreement among infection specialists, design engineers, and ventilation experts in this context. This review article aims to provide a good understanding of OR ventilation systems in the context of air quality and infection control from existing research and provide multidimensional insights for appropriate design and operation of the OR.

To this end, we have conducted a systematic review of the literature, covering 253 articles in this context. Systematic review and meta-analyses were used to map the evidence and identify research gaps in the existing clinical, practical, and engineering knowledge. The present study is categorized into six research focuses: ventilation system, thermal comfort, staff work practice and obstacles, door operation and passage, air cleaning technology, emission rate, and clothing systems.

In the conclusion, we summarize the key limitations of the existing studies and insights for future research direction.

Language: English
Year: 2021
Pages: 102693
ISSN: 23527102
Types: Journal article
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102693
ORCIDs: 0000-0002-9361-1796 , 0000-0003-1502-6548 , 0000-0002-8675-2400 , 0000-0003-2915-3070 , 0000-0002-5258-6459 and Melikov, Arsen

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Log in as DTU user

Access

Analysis