About

Log in?

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Anyone can log in and get personalized features such as favorites, tags and feeds.

Log in as DTU user Log in as non-DTU user No thanks

DTU Findit

Journal article

The clearwater consensus: the estimation of metal hazard in fresh water

From

University of Toronto1

International Zinc Association2

Leiden University3

Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark4

Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark5

Radboud University Nijmegen6

University of California at Berkeley7

University of Copenhagen8

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor9

Wilfrid Laurier University10

National Institute of Public Health and the Environment11

Rio Tinto12

International Council on Mining and Metals13

Government of Ontario14

Polytechnique Montreal15

Institut national de la recherche scientifique16

Mining and Mineral Sciences Labs17

Exponent, Inc.18

Manhattan College19

...and 9 more

Background, aim, and scope Task Force 3 of the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative has been working towards developing scientifically sound methods for quantifying impacts of substances released into the environment. The Clearwater Consensus follows from the Lausanne (Jolliet et al. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:209–212, 2006) and Apeldoorn (Apeldoorn Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(5):334, 2004) statements by recommending an approach to and identifying further research for quantifying comparative toxicity potentials (CTPs) for ecotoxicological impacts to freshwater receptors from nonferrous metals.

The Clearwater Consensus describes stages and considerations for calculating CTPs that address inconsistencies in assumptions and approaches for organic substances and nonferrous metals by focusing on quantifying the bioavailable fraction of a substance. Methods A group of specialists in Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Impact Assessment, metal chemistry, and ecotoxicology met to review advances in research on which to base a consensus on recommended methods to calculate CTPs for metals.

Conclusions and recommendations Consensus was reached on introducing a bioavailability factor (BF) into calculating CTPs where the BF quantifies the fraction of total dissolved chemical that is truly dissolved, assuming that the latter is equivalent to the bioavailable fraction. This approach necessitates calculating the effects factor, based on a HC50EC50, according to the bioavailable fraction of chemical.

The Consensus recommended deriving the BF using a geochemical model, specifically WHAM VI. Consensus was also reached on the need to incorporate into fate calculations the speciation, size fractions, and dissolution rates of metal complexes for the fate factor calculation. Consideration was given to the characteristics of the evaluative environment defined by the multimedia model, which is necessary because of the dependence of metal bioavailability on water chemistry.

Language: English
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Year: 2010
Pages: 143-147
ISSN: 16147502 and 09483349
Types: Journal article
DOI: 10.1007/s11367-009-0140-2
ORCIDs: Hauschild, Michael Zwicky

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Log in as DTU user

Access

Analysis