About

Log in?

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Anyone can log in and get personalized features such as favorites, tags and feeds.

Log in as DTU user Log in as non-DTU user No thanks

DTU Findit

Journal article

Operationalizing risk-based cumulative effect assessments in the marine environment

From

Johann Heinrich von Thunen Institute1

National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark2

Section for Oceans and Arctic, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark3

University of Tartu4

DG Joint Research Centre5

National Marine Park of Zakynthos6

CSIC - Institute of Marine Sciences7

Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon8

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki9

Universidad del Pais Vasco10

Université PSL11

University of the Aegean12

University Iuav of Venice13

Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences14

...and 4 more

Ecosystem-based management requires an assessment of the cumulative effects of human pressures and environmental change. The operationalization and integration of cumulative effects assessments (CEA) into decision-making processes often lacks a comprehensive and transparent framework. A risk-based CEA framework that divides a CEA in risk identification, risk analysis and risk evaluation, could structure such complex analyses and facilitate the establishment of direct science-policy links.

Here, we examine carefully the operationalization of such a risk-based CEA framework with the help of eleven contrasting case studies located in Europe, French Polynesia, and Canada. We show that the CEA framework used at local, sub-regional, and regional scales allowed for a consistent, coherent, and transparent comparison of complex assessments.

From our analysis, we pinpoint four emerging issues that, if accurately addressed, can improve the take up of CEA outcomes by management: 1) framing of the CEA context and defining risk criteria; 2) describing the roles of scientists and decision-makers; 3) reducing and structuring complexity; and 4) communicating uncertainty.

Moreover, with a set of customized tools we describe and analyze for each case study the nature and location of uncertainty as well as trade-offs regarding available knowledge and data used for the CEA. Ultimately, these tools aid decision-makers to recognize potential caveats and repercussions of management decisions.

One key recommendation is to differentiate CEA processes and their context in relation to governance advice, marine spatial planning or regulatory advice. We conclude that future research needs to evaluate how effective management measures are in reducing the risk of cumulative effects. Changing governance structures takes time and is often difficult, but we postulate that well-framed and structured CEA can function as a strategic tool to integrate ecosystem considerations across multiple sectorial policies.

Language: English
Year: 2020
Pages: 138118
ISSN: 18791026 and 00489697
Types: Journal article
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138118
ORCIDs: 0000-0001-6235-5868 , 0000-0002-1186-4766 , 0000-0002-5137-7540 , 0000-0002-1666-8772 , 0000-0002-6044-1719 , 0000-0001-9207-4792 and Ojaveer, Henn

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Log in as DTU user

Access

Analysis