About

Log in?

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Anyone can log in and get personalized features such as favorites, tags and feeds.

Log in as DTU user Log in as non-DTU user No thanks

DTU Findit

Conference paper

Hybrid Segmentation of Vessels and Automated Flow Measures in In-Vivo Ultrasound Imaging

From

Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark1

Biomedical Engineering, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark2

BK Medical ApS3

Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte4

Center for Fast Ultrasound Imaging, Centers, Technical University of Denmark5

Vector Flow Imaging (VFI) has received an increasing attention in the scientific field of ultrasound, as it enables angle independent visualization of blood flow. VFI can be used in volume flow estimation, but a vessel segmentation is needed to make it fully automatic. A novel vessel segmentation procedure is crucial for wall-to-wall visualization, automation of adjustments, and quantification of flow in state-of-the-art ultrasound scanners.

We propose and discuss a method for accurate vessel segmentation that fuses VFI data and B-mode for robustly detecting and delineating vessels. The proposed method implements automated VFI flow measures such as peak systolic velocity (PSV) and volume flow. An evaluation of the performance of the segmentation algorithm relative to expert manual segmentation of 60 frames randomly chosen from 6 ultrasound sequences (10 frame randomly chosen from each sequence) is also presented.

Dice coefficient denoting the similarity between segmentations is used for the evaluation. The coefficient ranges between 0 and 1, where 1 indicates perfect agreement and 0 indicates no agreement. The Dice coefficient was 0.91 indicating to a very agreement between automated and manual expert segmentations.

The flowrig results also demonstrated that the PSVs measured from VFI had a mean relative error of 14.5% in comparison with the actual PSVs. The error for the PSVs measured from spectral Doppler was 29.5%, indicating that VFI is 15% more precise than spectral Doppler in PSV measurement.

Language: English
Publisher: IEEE
Year: 2016
Pages: 1-4
Proceedings: 2016 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium
Series: Ieee International Ultrasonics Symposium, Ius
ISBN: 1467398977 , 1467398985 , 9781467398978 and 9781467398985
ISSN: 19485719 and 19485727
Types: Conference paper
DOI: 10.1109/ULTSYM.2016.7728656
ORCIDs: 0000-0002-9380-1688 , Moshavegh, Ramin and Jensen, Jørgen Arendt

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Log in as DTU user

Access

Analysis