About

Log in?

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Anyone can log in and get personalized features such as favorites, tags and feeds.

Log in as DTU user Log in as non-DTU user No thanks

DTU Findit

Journal article

Is vapor pressure or the octanol–air partition coefficient a better descriptor of the partitioning between gas phase and organic matter?

From

Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry and Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto at Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, Ont., Canada M1C 1A4

Both the sub-cooled liquid vapor pressure (PL) and the octanol–air partition coefficient (KOA) are used to describe the partitioning of non-polar organic compounds between the gas phase and a variety of natural organic substrates in soil, atmospheric particles and foliage. Whether the former is preferable over the latter depends on whether the interaction of the organic compound with the organic matter (OM) resembles more those in the pure liquid than those in liquid octanol.

The activity coefficient in octanol (γOct) is a quantitative measure of the difference between these two interactions. An analysis of PL and KOA values for several sets of non-polar and semi-volatile organic compounds (chlorobenzenes, PCBs, PCNs, PCDD/Fs, PBDEs), and of the γOct values derived from these, reveals that γOct tends to range from 1 to 10 suggesting that PL and KOA are very highly correlated.

Furthermore, the estimated standard deviation of γOct tends to be so large that PL and KOA are virtually indistinguishable within the measurement uncertainty. Whether γOct within a group of related compounds increases, decreases or stays the same with increasing molecular mass depends on the specific KOA and PL data set used in the calculation of γOct.

This implies that with the current precision of KOA, PL and partition coefficients involving OM it is impossible to judge one parameter better than the other.

Language: English
Year: 2003
Pages: 2867-2878
ISSN: 18732844 and 13522310
Types: Journal article
DOI: 10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00213-9

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Log in as DTU user

Access

Analysis