About

Log in?

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Anyone can log in and get personalized features such as favorites, tags and feeds.

Log in as DTU user Log in as non-DTU user No thanks

DTU Findit

Report · Journal article

Scientific principles for the identification of endocrine-disrupting chemicals: a consensus statement

From

Federal Institute for Risk Assessment1

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark2

Norwegian Institute of Public Health3

UK Health Security Agency4

Istituto Superiore di Sanita5

National Institute of Public Health and the Environment6

Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale7

Utrecht University8

University of Massachusetts9

Imperial College London10

Brunel University London11

Swedish Toxicology Sciences Research Center (Swetox)12

Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin13

Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors14

University of Konstanz15

Technical University of Munich16

Karolinska Institutet17

Research Group for Reproductive Toxicology, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark18

...and 8 more

Endocrine disruption is a specific form of toxicity, where natural and/or anthropogenic chemicals, known as "endocrine disruptors" (EDs), trigger adverse health effects by disrupting the endogenous hormone system. There is need to harmonize guidance on the regulation of EDs, but this has been hampered by what appeared as a lack of consensus among scientists.

This publication provides summary information about a consensus reached by a group of world-leading scientists that can serve as the basis for the development of ED criteria in relevant EU legislation. Twenty-three international scientists from different disciplines discussed principles and open questions on ED identification as outlined in a draft consensus paper at an expert meeting hosted by the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) in Berlin, Germany on 11-12 April 2016.

Participants reached a consensus regarding scientific principles for the identification of EDs. The paper discusses the consensus reached on background, definition of an ED and related concepts, sources of uncertainty, scientific principles important for ED identification, and research needs. It highlights the difficulty in retrospectively reconstructing ED exposure, insufficient range of validated test systems for EDs, and some issues impacting on the evaluation of the risk from EDs, such as non-monotonic dose-response and thresholds, modes of action, and exposure assessment.

This report provides the consensus statement on EDs agreed among all participating scientists. The meeting facilitated a productive debate and reduced a number of differences in views. It is expected that the consensus reached will serve as an important basis for the development of regulatory ED criteria.

Language: English
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Year: 2017
Pages: 1001-1006
ISSN: 14320738 and 03405761
Types: Report and Journal article
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-016-1866-9
ORCIDs: Hass, Ulla

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Log in as DTU user

Access

Analysis