About

Log in?

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Anyone can log in and get personalized features such as favorites, tags and feeds.

Log in as DTU user Log in as non-DTU user No thanks

DTU Findit

Journal article

Comparison of two electrolyte models for the carbon capture with aqueous ammonia

From

Center for Energy Resources Engineering, Centers, Technical University of Denmark1

Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark2

CERE – Center for Energy Ressources Engineering, Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark3

Ørsted A/S4

Polytechnic University of Milan5

Post-combustion carbon capture is attracting much attention due to the fact that it can be retrofitted on existing coal power plants. Among the most interesting technologies is the one that employs aqueous ammonia solutions to absorb the generated carbon dioxide. The evaluation of such process requires the modeling of electrolyte solutions.

In this work two thermodynamic models for electrolyte solutions are compared against each other with respect to experimental data. They are the e-NRTL model and the Extended UNIQUAC model, both implemented in the commercial software Aspen Plus®1 (version 7.2). Subsequently, a simple absorption/regeneration layout is simulated employing both models and the process performances are compared.

In general, the Extended UNIQUAC appears to describe the experimental data for larger ranges of temperature, pressure and concentration of ammonia more satisfactorily. The energy performances computed with the Extended UNIQUAC models are less promising than with the e-NRTL model.

Language: English
Year: 2012
Pages: 61-72
ISSN: 18780148 and 17505836
Types: Journal article
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.02.002
ORCIDs: Thomsen, Kaj

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Log in as DTU user

Access

Analysis