About

Log in?

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Anyone can log in and get personalized features such as favorites, tags and feeds.

Log in as DTU user Log in as non-DTU user No thanks

DTU Findit

Journal article

Assessing and managing multiple risks in a changing world — The Roskilde recommendations

From

University of Gothenburg1

Enviresearch Ltd2

Halmstad University3

Aarhus University4

Norwegian Institute for Water Research5

University of Aveiro6

Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark7

Section for Structural Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark8

United States Environmental Protection Agency9

Norwegian Geotechnical Institute10

Polish Academy of Sciences11

Roskilde University12

Chapema Environmental Strategies Ltd.13

Stockholm University14

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor15

DHI Water - Environment - Health16

Simon Fraser University17

National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark18

Section for Marine Ecology and Oceanography, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark19

Delft University of Technology20

...and 10 more

Roskilde University (Denmark) hosted a November 2015 workshop, Environmental Risk—Assessing and Managing Multiple Risks in a Changing World. This Focus article presents the consensus recommendations of 30 attendees from 9 countries regarding implementation of a common currency (ecosystem services) for holistic environmental risk assessment and management; improvements to risk assessment and management in a complex, human‐modified, and changing world; appropriate development of protection goals in a 2‐stage process; dealing with societal issues; risk‐management information needs; conducting risk assessment of risk management; and development of adaptive and flexible regulatory systems.

The authors encourage both cross‐disciplinary and interdisciplinary approaches to address their 10 recommendations: 1) adopt ecosystem services as a common currency for risk assessment and management; 2) consider cumulative stressors (chemical and nonchemical) and determine which dominate to best manage and restore ecosystem services; 3) fully integrate risk managers and communities of interest into the risk‐assessment process; 4) fully integrate risk assessors and communities of interest into the risk‐management process; 5) consider socioeconomics and increased transparency in both risk assessment and risk management; 6) recognize the ethical rights of humans and ecosystems to an adequate level of protection; 7) determine relevant reference conditions and the proper ecological context for assessments in human‐modified systems; 8) assess risks and benefits to humans and the ecosystem and consider unintended consequences of management actions; 9) avoid excessive conservatism or possible underprotection resulting from sole reliance on binary, numerical benchmarks; and 10) develop adaptive risk‐management and regulatory goals based on ranges of uncertainty.

Language: English
Year: 2017
Pages: 7-16
ISSN: 15528618 and 07307268
Types: Journal article
DOI: 10.1002/etc.3513
ORCIDs: Dinh, Khuong Van , Miraglia, Simona and 0000-0002-6437-9473

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Log in as DTU user

Access

Analysis