About

Log in?

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Anyone can log in and get personalized features such as favorites, tags and feeds.

Log in as DTU user Log in as non-DTU user No thanks

DTU Findit

Journal article

Power-to-methane via co-electrolysis of H2O and CO2: The effects of pressurized operation and internal methanation

In Applied Energy 2019, Volume 250, pp. 1432-1445
From

Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne1

Electrochemistry, Department of Energy Conversion and Storage, Technical University of Denmark2

Department of Energy Conversion and Storage, Technical University of Denmark3

National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University4

University of Pisa5

This paper presents a model-based investigation to handle the fundamental issues for the design of co-electrolysis based power-to-methane at the levels of both the stack and system: the role of CO2 in co-electrolysis, the benefits of employing pressurized stack operation and the conditions of promoting internal methanation.

Results show that the electrochemical reaction of co-electrolysis is dominated by H2O splitting while CO2 is converted via reverse water-gas shift reaction. Increasing CO2 feed fraction mainly enlarges the concentration and cathode-activation overpotentials. Internal methanation in the stack can be effectively promoted by pressurized operation under high reactant utilization with low current density and large stack cooling.

For the operation of a single stack, methane fraction of dry gas at the cathode outlet can reach as high as 30 vol.% (at 30 bar and high flowrate of sweep gas), which is, unfortunately, not preferred for enhancing system efficiency due to the penalty from the pressurization of sweep gas. The number drops down to 15 vol.% (at 15 bar) to achieve the highest system efficiency (at 0.27 A/cm2).

The internal methanation can serve as an effective internal heat source to maintain stack temperature (thus enhancing electrochemistry), particularly at a small current density. This enables the co-electrolysis based power-to-methane to achieve higher efficiency than the steam-electrolysis based (90% vs 86% on higher heating value, or 83% vs 79% on lower heating value without heat and converter losses).

Language: English
Year: 2019
Pages: 1432-1445
ISSN: 18729118 and 03062619
Types: Journal article
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.098
ORCIDs: Rao, Megha , Hagen, Anke and 0000-0003-1752-5690

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Log in as DTU user

Access

Analysis