About

Log in?

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Anyone can log in and get personalized features such as favorites, tags and feeds.

Log in as DTU user Log in as non-DTU user No thanks

DTU Findit

Journal article

In-vivo Validation of Fast Spectral Velocity Estimation Techniques

From

Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark1

Center for Fast Ultrasound Imaging, Centers, Technical University of Denmark2

Spectrograms in medical ultrasound are usually estimated with Welch’s method (WM). WM is dependent on an observation window (OW) of up to 256 emissions per estimate to achieve sufficient spectral resolution and contrast. Two adaptive filterbank methods have been suggested to reduce the OW: Blood spectral Power Capon (BPC) and the Blood Amplitude and Phase EStimation method (BAPES).

Ten volunteers were scanned over the carotid artery. From each data set, 28 spectrograms were produced by combining four approaches (WM with a Hanning window (W.HAN), WM with a boxcar window (W.BOX), BPC and BAPES) and seven OWs (128, 64, 32, 16, 8, 4, 2). The full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) and the ratio between main and side-lobe levels were calculated at end-diastole for each spectrogram.

Furthermore, all 280 spectrograms were randomized and presented to nine radiologists for visual evaluation: useful/not useful. BAPES and BPC compared to WM had better resolution (lower FWHM) for all OW <128 while only BAPES compared to WM had improved contrast (higher ratio). According to the scores given by the radiologists, BAPES, BPC and W.HAN performed equally well (p > 0.05) at OW 128 and 64, while W.BOX scored less (p <0.05).

At OW 32, BAPES and BPC performed better than WM (p <0.0001) and BAPES was significantly superior to BPC at OW 16 (p = 0.0002) and 8 (p <0.0001). BPC at OW 32 performed as well as BPC at OW 128 (p = 0.29) and BAPES at OW 16 as BAPES at OW 128 (p = 0.55). WM at OW 16 and 8 failed as all four methods at OW 4 and 2.

The intra-observer variability tested for three radiologist showed on average good agreement (90%, κ = 0.79) and inter-observer variability showed moderate agreement (78%, κ = 0.56). The results indicated that BPC and BAPES had better resolution and BAPES better contrast than WM, and that OW can be reduced to 32 using BPC and 16 using BAPES without reducing the usefulness of the spectrogram.

This could potentially increase the temporal resolution of the spectrogram or the frame-rate of the interleaved B-mode images.

Language: English
Year: 2010
Pages: 52-59
ISSN: 18749968 and 0041624x
Types: Journal article
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2009.07.007
ORCIDs: Jensen, Jørgen Arendt and 0000-0002-9380-1688

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Log in as DTU user

Access

Analysis