About

Log in?

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Anyone can log in and get personalized features such as favorites, tags and feeds.

Log in as DTU user Log in as non-DTU user No thanks

DTU Findit

Journal article

Crustal uplift due to ice mass variability on Upernavik Isstrøm, west Greenland

From

National Space Institute, Technical University of Denmark1

Geodesy, National Space Institute, Technical University of Denmark2

University of Copenhagen3

University of Colorado4

Ohio State University5

University of Kansas6

We estimate the mass loss rate of Upernavik Isstrøm (UI) using surface elevation changes between a SPOT 5 Digital Elevation Model (DEM) from 2008 and NASA's Airborne Topographic Mapper (ATM) data from 2010. To assess the validity of our mass loss estimate, we analyze GPS data between 2007 and 2011 from two continuous receivers, UPVK and SRMP which are established on bedrock and located ∼65 and View the MathML source from the front of UI, respectively.

We construct along-track elevation changes on UI for several time intervals during 2005–2011, based on ATM, SPOT 5 and Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) data to assess temporal changes of UI. We estimate a mass loss rate of −6.7±4.2 Gt/yr, over an area of View the MathML source. The ice mass loss occurs primarily over the northern glacier of UI.

This pattern is also observed View the MathML source upstream, where we observe glacier thinning at a rate of −1.6±0.3 m/yr across the northern portion of UI and −0.5±0.1 m/yr across the southern portion. GPS measurements suggest bedrock uplift rates of 7.6±0.6 mm/yr (UPVK) and 16.2±0.6 mm/yr (SRMP).

The modeled ice mass loss of UI causes bedrock uplift rates of 1.3±0.6 mm/yr (UPVK) and 8.3±4.2 mm/yr (SRMP). Including additional contributions from ice mass changes outside UI and from Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA), we obtain total modeled uplift rates of 4.7±0.6 mm/yr (UPVK) and 13.8±4.2 mm/yr (SRMP).

The modeled uplift rates from our UI ice mass loss are substantially lower, indicating that additional mass loss is taking place outside of UI. We obtain a difference of 0.6 mm/yr between the modeled and observed relative uplift rates (SRMP relative to UPVK), suggesting that the mass loss of UI is well captured in the model.

We observe elevation changes from −15 to −40 m/yr near the front during the period 2005–2011, indicating that UI undergoes large variations in thinning pattern over short time spans.

Language: English
Year: 2012
Pages: 182-189
ISSN: 1385013x and 0012821x
Types: Journal article
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.08.024
ORCIDs: 0000-0002-8700-7023 , 0000-0002-8871-5179 , Nielsen, Karina and Khan, Shfaqat Abbas

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Log in as DTU user

Access

Analysis