About

Log in?

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Anyone can log in and get personalized features such as favorites, tags and feeds.

Log in as DTU user Log in as non-DTU user No thanks

DTU Findit

Journal article

Towards precise brain stimulation: Is electric field simulation related to neuromodulation?

From

Greifswald University Hospital1

Magnetic Resonance, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark2

Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark3

Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt4

Berlin Institute of Health5

Background: Recent research on neural and behavioral consequences of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has highlighted the impact of individual factors, such as brain anatomy which determines current field distribution and may thus significantly impact stimulation effects. Computational modeling approaches may significantly advance our understanding of such factors, but the association of simulation-based tDCS-induced fields and neurophysiological outcomes has not been investigated.

Objectives: To provide empirical evidence for the relationship between tDCS-induced neurophysiological outcomes and individually induced electric fields. Methods: We applied tDCS during eyes-closed resting-state functional resonance imaging (rsfMRI) and assessed pre-post magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) in 24 participants.

We aimed to quantify effects of 15-min tDCS using the “classical” left SM1-right supraorbital area montage on sensorimotor network (SMN) strength and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate concentrations, implementing a cross-over counterbalanced design with three stimulation conditions. Additional structural anatomical MRI sequences and recordings of individual electrode configurations allowed individual electric field simulations based on realistic head models of all participants for both conditions.

Results: On a neurophysiological level, we observed the expected reduction of GABA concentrations and increase in SMN strength, both during anodal and cathodal compared to sham tDCS, replicating previous results. The magnitudes of neurophysiological modulations induced by tDCS were significantly associated with simulation-based electric field strengths within the targeted left precentral gyrus.

Conclusion: Our findings corroborate previous reports on tDCS-induced neurophysiological modulations and further advance the understanding of underlying mechanisms by providing first empirical evidence for the association of the injected electric field and neuromodulatory effects.

Language: English
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2019
Pages: 1159-1168
ISSN: 18764754 and 1935861x
Types: Journal article
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.03.072
ORCIDs: 0000-0002-2839-4609 , Thielscher, Axel and Saturnino, Guilherme Bicalho

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Log in as DTU user

Access

Analysis