About

Log in?

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Anyone can log in and get personalized features such as favorites, tags and feeds.

Log in as DTU user Log in as non-DTU user No thanks

DTU Findit

Journal article ยท Report

Integration of epidemiological findings with mechanistic evidence in regulatory pesticide risk assessment: EFSA experiences

From

University of Oulu1

Research Group for Chemical Risk Assessment and GMO, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark2

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark3

European Food Safety Authority4

University of Granada5

Toxicological risk assessment of plant protection products (PPP) is currently carried out with the principal input from regulatory toxicology studies following OECD test guidelines, with little input from epidemiological data. An EFSA-commissioned systematic review of pesticide epidemiological studies (Ntzani et al. in Literature review on epidemiological studies linking exposure to pesticides and health effects.

EFSA supporting publication 2013:EN-497, 2013) revealed statistically significant associations, among others, between pesticide exposures, and Parkinson's disease and childhood leukemia. Thereafter, EFSA launched a project with a mandate for the plant protection products and their residues (PPR) Panel to set the ground for the use of epidemiological data in the risk assessment of pesticides, as requested by Regulation (EC) 1107/2009.

The project culminated with the publication of two EFSA's scientific opinions on the potential contribution of experimental investigations and epidemiological studies in PPP risk assessment and with the scientific conference held on 20 November 2017, in Parma, Italy. The application of modern methodologies in exposure assessment, toxicology and epidemiology would improve the pesticide risk assessment process and support a mechanistic shift for the integration of these three disciplines under a novel paradigm in risk assessment.

The application of the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) conceptual framework to this approach would contribute to gain insight into the biological plausibility of a hazard identified in epidemiological or experimental studies and would inform an Integrated Approach to Testing and Assessment (IATA) within a regulatory context.

Language: English
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Year: 2019
Pages: 1779-1788
ISSN: 14320738 and 03405761
Types: Journal article and Report
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-019-02467-w
ORCIDs: 0000-0003-2132-3864 and Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Log in as DTU user

Access

Analysis