About

Log in?

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Anyone can log in and get personalized features such as favorites, tags and feeds.

Log in as DTU user Log in as non-DTU user No thanks

DTU Findit

Journal article

Broadband Minimum Variance Beamforming for Ultrasound Imaging

From

Biomedical Engineering, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark1

Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark2

Center for Fast Ultrasound Imaging, Centers, Technical University of Denmark3

A minimum variance (MV) approach for near-field beamforming of broadband data is proposed. The approach is implemented in the frequency domain, and it provides a set of adapted, complex apodization weights for each frequency subband. The performance of the proposed MV beamformer is tested on simulated data obtained using Field II.

The method is validated using synthetic aperture data and data obtained from a plane wave emission. Data for 13 point targets and a circular cyst with a radius of 5 mm are simulated. The performance of the MV beamformer is compared with delay-an sum (DS) using boxcar weights and Harming weights and is quantified by the full width at half maximum (FWHM) and the peak-side-lobe level (PSL).

Single emission {DS boxcar, DS Harming, MV} provide a PSL of {-16, -36, -49} dB and a FWHM of {0.79, 1.33, 0.08} mm. Using all 128 emissions, {DS boxcar, DS Harming, MV} provides a PSL of {-32, -49, -65} dB, and a FWHM of {0.63, 0.97, 0.08} rum. The contrast of the beamformed single emission responses of the circular cyst was calculated as {-18, -37, -40} dB.

The simulations have shown that the frequency subband MV beamformer provides a significant increase in lateral resolution compared with DS, even when using considerably fewer emissions. An increase in resolution is seen when using only one single emission. Furthermore, the effect of steering vector errors is investigated.

The steering vector errors are investigated by applying an error of the sound speed estimate to the ultrasound data. As the error increases, it is seen that the MV beamformer is not as robust compared with the DS beamformer with boxcar an Harming weights. Nevertheless, it is noted that the DS does not outperform the MV beamformer.

For errors of 2% and 4% of the correct value, the FWHM are {0.81, 1.25, 0.34) mm and {0.89, 1.44, 0.46} min, respectively.

Language: English
Publisher: IEEE
Year: 2009
Pages: 314-325
ISSN: 15258955 and 08853010
Types: Journal article
DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2009.1040
ORCIDs: Jensen, Jørgen Arendt

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Log in as DTU user

Access

Analysis