About

Log in?

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Anyone can log in and get personalized features such as favorites, tags and feeds.

Log in as DTU user Log in as non-DTU user No thanks

DTU Findit

Conference paper

Simulation of Second Harmonic Ultrasound Fields

In Proceedings of Ieee International Ultrasonics Symposium — 2010, pp. 2191-2194
From

Biomedical Engineering, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark1

Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark2

BK Medical ApS3

Center for Fast Ultrasound Imaging, Centers, Technical University of Denmark4

A non-linear ultrasound imaging simulation software should be capable of simulating the non-linear fields for any kind of transducer, focusing, apodization, and attenuation. At present, a major issue is the overlong simulation time of the non-linear software. An Angular Spectrum Approach (ASA) using a quasi-linear approximation for solving the Westervelt equation can simulate the second harmonic pressure at any distance.

Therefore, it shortens the execution time compared with the operator splitting method. The purpose of this paper is to implement the monochromatic solution for the second harmonic component based on ASA and Field II, and to compare with results from the simulation program Abersim. A linear array transducer with a center frequency of 4 MHz and 64 active elements is used as the transmitting source.

The initial plane is 5 mm away from the transducer surface, and the fundamental pressure is calculated by Field II. The second harmonic pressure in k-space along the propagating direction is calculated as an auto-convolution of the fundamental pressure multiplied by an exponential propagating coefficient.

In this case, the second harmonic pressure can be calculated using ASA for any plane parallel to the initial plane. In the focal plane (elevation-lateral) at 60 mm from the transducer surface, calculated by ASA, the RMS errors for the fundamental component are 2.66% referred to Field II and 4.28% referred to Abersim.

For the second harmonic component, the RMS error is 0.91% referred to Abersim.

Language: English
Publisher: IEEE
Year: 2010
Pages: 2191-2194
Proceedings: 2010 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium
ISBN: 1457703807 and 9781457703805
Types: Conference paper
DOI: 10.1109/ULTSYM.2010.0553
ORCIDs: Jensen, Jørgen Arendt

DTU users get better search results including licensed content and discounts on order fees.

Log in as DTU user

Access

Analysis